SEO Podcasts

Podcast hosting and distribution
Secure access to private subscribers
Concierge private podcasting experience
Stay connected with your team through podcasting
Seriously Simple Podcasting Plugin
White glove assistance for your podcasts
Get a free website as unique as your podcast
Spend time creating your podcast not transcribing it
Automatically place highly relevant ads in all your episodes
Accept payments directly from your listeners
Reach your audience on the largest search engine
Grow your Audience with the right analytics
Done For You Production Of Every Episode
Launch Your Podcast The Right Way
Check Out A Few Of The Shows We Work With

Product Developments & Releases
4 min read
Last updated August 17, 2022
It’s always been difficult to rank podcasts well on Google and other search engines. This is because search engines like Google can only read text. It doesn’t have any way of knowing what’s said in your episode, so it doesn’t know which terms to rank it for. 
You can fight this problem a bit by including show notes and episode transcriptions on each episode’s page along with the media player. This gives Google something to read and evaluate, but it doesn’t go far enough. 
In order to make your pages attractive to search engines, it’s important to include the specific data points those search engines are looking for to understand your page. Ideally, you need a way to do this automatically and at scale so you can get back to producing great podcast content, rather than spending hours writing tedious HTML code. 
That’s where our new Yoast SEO integration comes in. With this new feature, you can supercharge the power of Yoast SEO and add key SEO data points to the code of your podcast episode pages. It all happens automatically. There’s no need to write a single line of code. 
Let’s talk about why this integration is important and how it works. 
Yoast is the industry-leading SEO tool for WordPress sites. It helps website owners produce great content and get more traffic from search engines by handling all of the technical details of SEO. It’s used by more than 12 million websites!
If you’re a WordPress website owner or manager, you’re probably familiar with Yoast. It helps you format your pages for better readability and search engine appeal. Yoast adds a widget to the bottom of the page and post editor that gives you valuable tips to improve that page/post’s SEO, thereby helping you map content on-site for search engines. 
But Yoast offers another benefit as well: structured data markup. Here’s Yoast’s definition of structured data: 
Structured data is a way of describing your website to make it easier for search engines to understand. You need a so-called vocabulary to make it work, and the one used by the big search engines is Schema.org. Schema.org provides a series of tags and properties to describe your products, reviews, local business listings, job postings, et cetera in detail.
The major search engines, Google, Bing, Yandex, and Yahoo, collectively developed this vocabulary to reach a shared language to understand websites better. Today, search engines use it for many things, from fact-checking content to COVID-19 alerting!
If structured data is implemented correctly on a page, search engines have a much easier time understanding what that page is about. While there’s no evidence that structured data has a direct effect on rankings, they make your pages appear more prominently in the search results, especially if you can get your page to appear in the form of rich results. This improved visibility is known to boost click-through rates. 
To be clear, structured data is not visible on the page. It’s code that exists in your HTML, but won’t be seen by viewers. It’s solely for search engines. Think of it like a secret language that lets you tell search engines exactly what your page is about. 
Now, Yoast integrates directly with Castos’ Seriously Simple Podcasting WordPress plugin in order to offer rich SEO structured data to every podcast episode page you publish. 
With this integration, Yoast will automatically add structured data markup about your podcast to your podcast pages using the built-in schema system. This will help search engines (namely Google) understand your show, categorize it properly, and rank it high. 
Which structured data points will be included in your pages?
All you have to do to take advantage of this powerful SEO integration is simply install Yoast SEO and Seriously Simple Podcasting. Yoast will automatically pull the necessary data from your Seriously Simple Podcast RSS feed details to add relevant podcast schema to your pages.
The result? Your pages will become more attractive to search engines. You’ll increase the likelihood of getting rich results on search results pages. And there’s a chance your rankings will improve. Keep in mind that this doesn’t require any work on your part. All you have to do is activate the integration. 
See it for yourself. To test whether your site has Rich Text available to Google you can use any existing podcast episode URL in this testing tool.
And here’s what search engines see. Notice all of that extra data they have to evaluate your page. This gives you an easy way to see what Rich Text your site is already displaying for Google to process. It also helps you identify what’s missing. 
At Castos, we’re all-in on automation. This integration is just one piece of our growing ecosystem of automated tools. Our goal is to make creating and marketing your show fast and seamless. Check out some of our other automated tools:
Action
Read to start your own podcast? Learn the nitty-gritty details of starting your own show in our comprehensive guide. Learn how to start a podcast.
Thanks for your article! We are going to tune Yoast.
Comment


Δ
Resources
Last week, Apple announced that all Apple Podcasts content would be available directly on your browser. That’s great news for all of us content creators because instead of having to …
Craig Hewitt
August 27, 2024
3 min read
Every podcast needs a great-looking website. Whether you’re using it to grow your podcast subscriber base, increase your YouTube channel followers, or connect with your listeners, your podcast website is …
Craig Hewitt
August 5, 2024
4 min read
One of the best things about podcasting is how efficient it is in creating several different usable forms of content in a very short amount of time.  In one 60 …
Craig Hewitt
March 11, 2024
4 min read
Castos runs entirely on renewable energy.

source

Download your copy of SEO Trends 2025 and discover what to be hopeful about in a changing search world.
Join us in analyzing 3 case studies that show the importance of driving brand search behavior and engagement, and how to do it in months, instead of years.
Download this guide and learn how to optimize and manage Google Performance Max campaigns, with expert insights and actionable strategies to ensure your campaigns are effective.
With Tom Capper, we will dive into fresh data comparing the prevalence of AI Overviews by industry, geographic location, search intent stage and more, along with what factors correlate with appearing in them.
Join us in analyzing 3 case studies that show the importance of driving brand search behavior and engagement, and how to do it in months, instead of years.
Join us as we dive into exclusive survey data from industry-leading SEOs, digital marketers, content marketers, and more to highlight the top priorities and challenges that will shape the future of search in 2025.
Trying to figure out why your rich snippets are not showing in SERPs? Here are 12 possible reasons for this and what you can do
Google’s organic search results used to be made up of 10 plain blue links and a small description for each.
Today, Google’s SERPs are much more feature-rich and complex.
Search features, such as rich snippets and featured snippets, draw attention of Google users away from the plain old links.
How can you combat this?
By making sure your sites have rich snippets as well.
One way to get rich snippets is through structured data – or schema.
This is markup that can be added to a website to help search engines provide more detailed results for users, appearing in the form of a rich snippet.
SEO pros can work with developers to set up good structured data on their pages.
Google loves rich snippets – and so do users – especially on the search results for recipes and products.
Rich snippets provide star ratings, recipe markup, and much more.
They draw the eyes of searchers and, as a result, typically have higher click-through rates.

There are many ways to implement structured data markup to achieve a featured snippet.
You can use JSON-LD, RDFa, and Microdata to set up your structured data JSON-LD is one of the best ways to keep your structured data consistent.
Schema.org is a collaborative vocabulary source you can use with RDFa, Microdata, and JSON-LD, to find new ways to mark up your data.
Google has its own standards that are based on Schema.org specifications.
Marking up your content with structured data can be a great way to beef up how machines can read your page.
It’s definitely worth putting effort into to stand out from the crowd.
Sometimes, though, you go through all the effort of finding relevant structured data.
You’ve convinced stakeholders that it’s a good idea to mark up your pages, created proper markup, and published it – but nothing happens.
Your snippets aren’t enriched, you just have plain old blue links.
Why?
Let’s walk through some of the reasons why your rich snippets may not be appearing in Google’s search results.
Many assume that because they added the code to the website, Google will automatically begin to feature rich snippets.
However, this is not so.
Google reserves the right to deny service to your structured data.
On top of this, Google only supports certain kinds of structured data. They don’t support all the schema types on schema.org and rich snippets only appear with certain schema types.
The types of structured data supported by Google include:
Additionally, if structured data markup does not meet Google’s quality standards, they reserve the right to not display it in search results.
Some of the quality standards the Google expects from markup include:
More of these guidelines are outlined below.
If your marked up content isn’t going to provide a user with a better search experience, you’d best believe Google won’t prioritize showing a rich snippet.
So you need to make sure the structured data is relevant to the content on the same page.
Remember, schema is describing your content to a machine.
Is there any way the machine would see an inconsistency between your markup and your pages?
If markup data, especially review structured data, contains profanity or vulgar language, it won’t be displayed as a rich snippet.
No cursing!
This is true for adult sites, and with safesearch off.
This is the most common reason why rich snippets aren’t showing for pages in SERPs.
There are many areas where the smallest coding detail can be overlooked and result in Google not being able to understand the markup.
Schema.org can provide insight into every type of structured data markup that one could ever want to implement on a website.
The guidelines, though, must be followed to a “T” in terms of detail.
One of the most common reasons why this happens centers on how the code for structured markup was added to the site.
A common error is when schema.org elements are not properly nested.
Nesting is the concept that HTML code needs to properly identify when a web page starts and stops addressing a particular topic.
For example, when a page has a main entity such as a Product, Recipe, LocalBusiness, etc., the mainEntity itemprop should be implemented alongside the main entity’s itemscope.
All attributes that are related to a certain entity are required to be nested within the HTML node.
A common error is when HTML nodes are closed prematurely.

Another common error when it comes to implementing markup is unclosed HTML tags.
Each HTML tag must be opened, as well as closed.
If tags aren’t properly closed, Google’s structured data reader most likely won’t read the correct nesting and become confused.

Duplicated aggregateRating itemprops are yet another common hold-up when it comes to rich snippets not displaying in search results.
Each entity should be laid out using a type itemscope.
However, one sole aggregateRating itemprop is required for each itemscope.
Multiple versions of this will create additional disarray for Google and will result in no review stars appearing.
In addition, missing aggregateRating itemprops will also confuse Google as it will provide a rating from only one individual, and not the collective whole.
You can use Schema.org vocabulary with a variety of encodings such as RDFa, Microdata, and JSON-LD.
It is important to make sure, though, that only one of these structured data encodings should be utilized on a single web page, as mixing different encodings will cause rich snippets to not display correctly.
Using different encodings also makes the structured data harder to maintain and it opens doors for mistakes and inconsistencies.
This is true even if you have two structured data types on the same page.
For example, recipe markup and review markup can be on the same page; but they should both use the same encoding.
If you have one of these languages alongside older markup, like data-vocabulary, it’s best to remove the older markup.
It’s probably worthwhile to consolidate down to just one and strategize on how to use that consistently across your site.
When trying to obtain rich snippet results, do not use organization markup on every page.
John Mueller of Google has said that it doesn’t matter where the markup is used as long as it’s not on every page.
Supporting review content may also be missing, in general, from rich snippets if Google doesn’t trust the authenticity of the domain.
Make sure your site is served over HTTPS, and that you only embed HTTPS content on HTTPS pages.
If you use JavaScript to implement your structured data, or even to modify that markup, you can end up with inconsistent markup depending on whether JavaScript is enabled or disabled.
Look at your structured data in View Source vs. Inspect Element.
Is the structured data different?
Could JavaScript have introduced errors or complications?
If a site has few pages, or few pages with marked-up structured data, a rich snippet may not appear.
If Google, or users, can’t see the information you have marked up with structured data, Google sees that as being misleading.
It’s important to make sure content that is marked up with structured data is visible, and not hidden behind click events or CSS.
It is important that an XML sitemap feature the <lastmod> attribute to signal to Google that pages need to be reindexed.
You can also force Google to re-crawl the page in the URL inspector in Search Console.
Google doesn’t discover marked-up content instantly, but rather when it crawls a site next.
Even then, it may still take a longer period of time for rich snippet results to appear.
It is possible, though, to notify Google that content on a site has been marked up.
You can use a couple of tools to ensure that structured data markup fulfills Google’s requirements.
These tools include:
Google previously also supported the use of the Structured Data Testing Tool.
While this tool is still useful, Google is shuttering support of it in favor of the Rich Results test.
More Resources:
Image Credits
All screenshots taken by author, August 2020
Natalie Hoben is a Digital Marketing Specialist at Forthea Interactive, a results-driven online marketing company.
Conquer your day with daily search marketing news.
Join Our Newsletter.
Get your daily dose of search know-how.
In a world ruled by algorithms, SEJ brings timely, relevant information for SEOs, marketers, and entrepreneurs to optimize and grow their businesses — and careers.
Copyright © 2024 Search Engine Journal. All rights reserved. Published by Alpha Brand Media.

source

What was The 2023 Criminal Case on Zach Bryan Amid Brianna ‘Chickenfry’ LaPaglia Controversy? Explained
Tim Matheson Shares Insights on Avoiding Cocaine Addiction in 70s Hollywood in Memoir Damn Glad to Meet You
THROWBACK: When Katrina Kaif talked about her idea of ideal parenting for her children; ‘When I have kids…’
Is Donald Trump a WWE Fan? Exploring His Fascination with Wrestling
Why Are Golden Bachelorette’s Joan And Chock Not Moving In Together? The Couple FINALLY Explains
Priyanka Chopra's husband Nick Jonas reacts to her new Gunday pics with a comment every girl would want to hear
Krishna Das views Anushka Sharma-Virat Kohli as ‘friends’, gives them a compliment that we all would agree with; find out
Dune: Prophecy Season 1 Episode 1 Ending Explained – Why Did Desmond Hart Kill Pruwet Richese?
‘Do you have any shame at all?’: Radikaa Sarathkumar recalls Dhanush’s reaction on learning that Nayanthara was dating Vignesh Shivan on NRD sets
Capricorn to Leo: 4 Zodiac Signs Who See Their Brothers And Sisters as Influential Mentors
70+ Unrequited Love Quotes That Rightly Encapsulate Unsaid Emotions
15 Significant Signs a Man Is Falling in Love With You
Taurus to Pisces: 4 Zodiac Signs Who Understand the Importance of Personal Space in Love
World Kindness Day: Celebrate the Special Day with Enlightening Kindness Quotes
40 Entertaining 50th Birthday Party Games to Jazz Things Up
Aries to Libra: 4 Zodiac Signs Who Ensure Their Children Love Healthy Competition
100 Amazing “Respect Women” Quotes to Celebrate Her Strength
Virgo to Leo: 4 Zodiac Signs Who Prioritize Short-term Spending Over Long-term Savings
Kim Jung Hyun ‘positively considering’ next role in romance drama A Hundred Memories with Kim Da Mi and Shin Ye Eun
Happy Birthday Han So Hee: Komparing her acting range in action-thrillers like Gyeongseong Creature versus romance in Nevertheless
TXT breaks BTS’ record as The Star Chapter: SANCTUARY debuts at No 1 on top album sales, takes 2nd spot on Billboard 200
'Ask RM': Pharrell Williams responds to questions about unreleased collab with BTS' leader teased in 2022
‘Only band I will be part of is BTS’: Jin refutes plans to launch own team and expresses desire to explore different styles as soloist
2NE1’s Park Bom exits Manila concert midway due to poor health; fails to return despite emergency medical aid
The Trunk stills: Gong Yoo and Seo Hyun Jin’s romance is interrupted by ex-wife Jung Yun Ha’s sudden appearance; PICS
Lee Jin Wook and Hyeri are in talks to lead upcoming legal drama Esquire; to start filming in March 2025
Wooga Squad's Park Seo Joon, Choi Woo Shik and more reunite for Park Hyung Sik's birthday; special shoutout for BTS' V
Palak Tiwari in black bikini is making us all crave an exotic beach vacation ASAP
Khushi Kapoor proves that minimalism can be bold with her brown cut-out dress and sleek Gucci bag pairing
Priyanka Chopra redefines glam in Magda Butrym tank and mini skirt, tops it off with jaw-dropping Rs 3.4 lakh Bvlgari bag
Rashmika Mandanna in burgundy saree is the perfect mix of fire and flower at Pushpa 2: The Rule trailer launch
Kajol's chic look in Aisha Rao’s Starboard and Port printed pantsuit can be your perfect wedding function inspiration
Sonam Kapoor sets major fashion waves with her white shirt dress and DIOR accessories for airport look & undoubtedly, it deserves 10/10
Khushi Kapoor's stylish bachelorette trip in pink bikini and 3-piece boho outfit has us screaming ‘HOT DAMN’
Best dressed of the week: Kareena Kapoor, Kiara Advani and more who ruled the fashion scene
Shilpa Shetty aces airport style in a chic blue dress and denim jacket, but her dazzling Birkin bag steals the show
Yvette Nicole Brown’s Weight Loss Story And Her Take on Obesity
Jessica Biel’s Workout Routine, Fitness Approach, Diet Plan, And More
Maren Morris's Weight Loss: Diet Plan and Workout Regime
Jessica Alba’s Workout Routine And Diet Plan: Get to Know Her Fitness Secrets
Scarlett Johansson’s Workout Routine: How She Stays Fit At 39
David Beckham’s Workout Routine And Diet Plan: Fitness Secrets Revealed
Christina Aguilera’s Weight Loss: Ozempic Rumors, Diet And More
Fat Joe Weight Loss of 200 Pounds with Ozempic And a Low-carb Diet
Jenna Jameson’s Weight Loss: How She Lost 80 Lbs with Keto And Intermittent Fasting
Amanda Bynes’ Plastic Surgery: Did She Get Any Work Done?
Salma Hayek’s Plastic Surgery Rumors: Nose Job And Other Beauty Secrets
Eva Mendes' Plastic Surgery: Did She Go Under the Knife?
Ben Affleck’s Plastic Surgery Rumors: Botox, Face Lift, And More
Tired of dandruff? Here are the top 7 most effective anti-dandruff solutions you need to try
Anne Hathaway’s Plastic Surgery Rumors: Nose Job, Facelift, And More
Sharon Osbourne’s Plastic Surgery, Anti-aging, Weight Loss, And More
Katy Perry’s Plastic Surgery: Did the “Roar” Singer Get Any Cosmetic Procedures?
Ryan Gosling’s Plastic Surgery Rumors for His New Film “The Fall Guy”
The Trunk has released new stills featuring Gong Yoo and Seo Hyun Jin ahead of its release, showcasing their complicated relationship.
The Trunk is an upcoming South Korean series starring the popular actor Gong Yoo alongside Seo Hyun Jin. Ahead of its release, several stills featuring the lead actors have been released. Despite the contract marriage, the two begin to form a genuine relationship as they showcase deep care and adoration.
On November 18, 2024, the production team of The Trunk released several stills featuring Gong Yoo as Han Jeong Won and Seo Hyun Jin as Noh In Ji. In the images, they both can be seen growing closer to each other, and they seem like an actual couple. Although they have different personalities, their longing to be loved might drive them to become closer.
Another intriguing pair, Lee Seo Yeon (Jung Yun Ha) and Yoon Ji Oh (Jo Yi Geon), captivate with their mysterious gazes, sparking curiosity. Lee Seo Yeon, driven by her twisted desires, not only divorces Han Jung Won but also embarks on a contract marriage, while Yoon Ji Oh, fully aware of all her secrets, continues to love her, adding layers of tension to the narrative.

In another set of stills, No In Ji, Han Jung Won, Lee Seo Yeon, and Yoon Ji Oh are seated at a table, surrounded by a palpable tension. Lee Seo Yeon provocatively wipes her ex-husband Han Jung Won’s mouth in front of both No In Ji and her current husband, Yoon Ji Oh. The complex dynamics among these four characters, each motivated by conflicting desires, intensify curiosity about the secrets buried within their marriages and the ultimate fate of their contract unions.
Based on the novel Trunk written by Kim Ryeo Ryeong, the story follows Noh In Ji, an employee for NM, a company specializing in providing spouses for fixed-term, one-year contract marriages. Having just completed her fourth contract, In Ji is matched with her next client, Han Jeong Won, a music producer whose life is marked by lingering pain and loneliness. 
Directed by Kim Kyu Tae and written by Park Eun Young, the show will be making its premiere on November 29, 2024.
ALSO READ: BTS’ V, aespa, RIIZE and more grab awards at Korean Grand Music Awards day 2; Check full list of winners

Journalist. Perennially hungry for entertainment. Carefully listens to everything that start with “so, last night…”. Currently making web more
Journalist. Perennially hungry for entertainment. Carefully listens to everything that start with “so, last night…”. Currently making web more entertaining place
By providing this information, you agree that we may process your personal data in accordance with our Privacy Statement

source

Content creators, do you ever feel like Google hates you? The logical part of you knows this probably isn’t true but you keep getting the sensation that the latest algorithm shift was specifically designed to decimate your traffic?
If you can relate, this episode of Mediavine on Air is for you!
We were joined in spring 2021 by Mediavine CEO Eric Hochberger, along with Nora Schlesinger, CEO of Growth Machine, which is an SEO-focused content marketing agency linked in our show notes. Basically, two SEO powerhouses, totally at our disposal for an hour and we got INTO it.
We talked keywords, links, site structure, algorithm shifts, analytics, Page Experience, basically anything and everything under the SEO sun. 
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Link Handout filled with resources related to the live
Ahrefs — An SEO resource recommended by Nora
SEO Like a CEO — A blog series on how to improve a website’s search engine optimization (SEO)
[MUSIC PLAYING] JENNY GUY: Howdy, friends. Welcome to Teal Talk. I’m Jenny Guy. I’m the director of marketing for Mediavine, and with you as always as your host for the show, which is all about the business of content creation.
It is March. Y’all, I don’t know how that happened. And even though I keep seeing the memes– I don’t know if you guys have seen them, the ones that are “How can it be March 2021 when it is still March 2020?” Because that is exactly how it feels continuously to me. I know, though, that it is almost midmonth. And so it’s a little bit delayed. But since this is our first time together, I’m going to ask, did the month start out like a lion or like lamb for y’all? Tell me and let me know.
I talked a little in the last show about this, about how this spring feels special to me for a number of reasons. And that is continuing on as March goes on, I’m pleased to report. And it’s not only because we are inching closer to May and all of those NSYNC memes that never fail to crack me up, the Justin “It’s going to be May” cracks me up every year. It never gets old.
But there’s the longer days. There’s the nicer weather. We’ve got the vaccine distribution happening. I am feeling cautiously optimistic for the first time in a while. So how are you guys doing out there? Tell us in the comments. Are you are you feeling optimistic about the spring? Does it feel different for you? Let us know.
And while we are checking in with each other on the start to our spring, let us also check in on everyone’s feelings with respect to our favorite acronym as content creators, and that is SEO. If you create digital content, there’s no way you haven’t heard it. I have personally heard it so much that it sometimes loses its meaning for me. It’s like when you say a word over and over and over again, and then it stops meaning things.
But the reason for that constant bringing up of SEO is its importance. Simply put, SEO is make or break for digital businesses. But for many of us, SEO is murky, and Google algorithm shifts can seem downright malicious if you don’t know what the heck is going on. So there is definitely a reason people pay thousands of for courses and audits from experts, but the question we’re here to answer today is, does it have to be hard? How can we keep the Google gods happy and ourselves sane?
And that is where my two guests from today come in. I’m about to introduce them. But while I’m introducing them, answer me this in the comments, please. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your SEO expertise with 10 being an SEO ninja and 1 being– Eric and I were having a pretty deep conversation about Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles before we started. But what is the opposite of a ninja? Or what is better than a ninja? Don’t answer those. Answer 1 to 10 if you’re good at SEO. 10 being the most confident in your skills, and 1 being I don’t know Google or what SEO stands for.
While I’m doing that, let me say hello to my wonderful guests today. Today we have with me very frequently is our CEO and co-founder of Mediavine, Eric Hochberger. Eric, how are you today?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Wonderful. How are you doing, Jenny?
JENNY GUY: I’m doing all right. I’m glad it’s spring. Did your spring– did your March come in like a lion or like lamb?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Here in South Florida we actually dread summer.
JENNY GUY: Oh.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: I know. It’s the opposite. That’s when the bad weather comes.
JENNY GUY: So you’re in your– is this still your happy place now, though?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Yeah. We’re still in the happy place. Don’t worry.
JENNY GUY: That’s good, the good place. OK. And then, for the first time on Teal Talk, we have Nora Schlesinger. Hello, Nora. I’m going to read all the–
NORA SCHLESINGER: Hey!
JENNY GUY: –things about you because there’s a whole lot.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Oh, gosh.
JENNY GUY: Nora Schlesinger is a lifelong baker and food lover, who, after a prolonged illness, was inspired to learn to cook and bake differently, and to share her recipes with others at acleanbake.com. Through blogging she taught herself SEO and made a career switch to lead project management at Growth Machine, but quickly, just to insert, she no longer leads project management. She’s the CEO of the company. No bigs. I have two CEOs on my program today. And Growth Machine is an SEO-focused content marketing agency. She now runs Growth Machine during the day while building A Clean Bake on the side from her home office in Chicago. Nora, welcome, to Teal Talk.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Thank you. I’m so excited to be here.
JENNY GUY: I’m really excited, too. We’re going to have a good time today.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Yeah.
JENNY GUY: So we’re getting a lot of– we’ve got all across the board. We’ve got sixes. We’ve got fives. We’ve got– I thought I was a nine, but lately eh. We’ve got threes, eights, 10’s. Oh, someone just said, you are all 10’s in my heart. Steve Marsi, fellow co-founder of Mediavine, just said 10 because of 24-hour access to Eric Hochberger. There we are.
OK, guys, if you have questions for us or want to know more about things, please drop those into the comments. Also, just to let you guys know, we’re doing things a little bit differently, where we typically share all those links during the course of the live, what we’re actually going to do this time is we have a link resource guide that we are going to share with you at very end. So you’ve got all of that at once. All you have to do now is just listen, enjoy, ask questions.
OK. So first, I want to hear from both of you, my guests today, about your SEO journey. In other words, other than what Steve just said, why should our audience listen to you when you talk about SEO? Because the truth is there are a lot of– I’m going to do the air quotes– “experts” out there about SEO. And a degree in SEO isn’t really a thing yet. And it’s tough to know who to trust. So let’s start with Nora. Will you tell us about your SEO journey?
NORA SCHLESINGER: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, I think that my SEO journey is probably pretty relatable to a lot of the people on this podcast. I might be further in it, but I started basically by looking at my Analytics several years ago, and seeing this [decline sound] in my traffic, and panicking. And I didn’t know a lot about SEO. I knew SEO was a thing that I needed to be more aware of. I knew that I couldn’t just continue to kind of mimic what the bigger bloggers did without knowing why they were doing it, or whether it was a good idea, or even if it was SEO related. I mean, it turns out a lot of it sort of indirectly was.
But I set out to teach myself SEO. I took a couple of courses, like e-courses. But mostly, it was trial and error, building out my own site, testing things, seeing what the effects were over time, and just gradually learning. And honestly, a lot of googling, like, why is this? And what is this? And is this plugin better than this plugin?
Since then, obviously, I’ve built up my skill set. I was able to get a job in SEO. And since then I’ve seen dozens and dozens of different sites in different categories on different CMS systems. Really, you name it. I’ve seen a lot. So I’m pretty well equipped to answer questions and share more detailed experience and expertise with the people who are here today.
JENNY GUY: And we are very lucky to have it. I wanted to ask if there were any– you said you did a lot of googling. Are there any specific resources that you might point people to that you found particularly helpful?
NORA SCHLESINGER: Yeah. I always look– I mean, I don’t go directly there, but usually in the search results you’ll see Moz, The Moz Blog is probably my number one. The SEMrush Blog, The Ahrefs Blog, sort of the big names in SEO, usually the big tools have phenomenal resources. Google itself is also a really wonderful resource.
Search Engine Roundtable, Marie Haynes, which she does the Search News You Can Use podcast. There’s also a newsletter that’s like for premium subscribers. I don’t get that. But a lot of it’s in the podcast. Mediavine, of course. I mean, I can’t neglect to mention how helpful the Mediavine blog and Facebook group always are.
JENNY GUY: Go on.
NORA SCHLESINGER: You’re wonderful. I love you guys. That’s true. I’m really not sucking up. I love you guys.
The Facebook group, especially the Mediavine publisher group, but other blogging focused Facebook groups are also a really great place to ask questions, because if you’re seeing it, someone else probably has seen it and hopefully solved it. So a lot of kind of like peer-to-peer interactions have helped me answer questions.
Or if I’m just seeing something weird in Analytics, I often will be like, has anyone ever seen this? Or is anyone else seeing this recent trend? If I can’t manage to connect it back to an obvious algorithm update or something. I’ll ask around. And the community is super helpful and responsive.
JENNY GUY: We are glad to hear all those things. And we did not pay her to say that. Eric, Eric, same question to you. Talk about your SEO background. Why does Steve value 24-hour access to you?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: 24-hour? I’m waiting for like the 3:00 AM SEO question from Steve.
JENNY GUY: Yeah.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: So I guess I’m going to start with I’m a Splinter is what we determined from the beginning of the pre-game.
JENNY GUY: Splinter was good. Shredder was bad, indeed.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: I’m not a Shredder. I’m a Splinter.
JENNY GUY: He’s a ninja.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: I’m not a Ninja Turtle, but I am old and wise, because I’ve been doing this since 1998 I think is when I got my SEO job. And that is prior to, I think, Google really existing at that point, because we were optimizing for AltaVista. And I can’t even remember the names of any more. MetaCrawler, WebCrawler, things that don’t exist anymore.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Ask Jeeves.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Ask Jeeves. That’s the one.
JENNY GUY: Jeeves!
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Ask Jeeves.
JENNY GUY: Ah, I loved their logo.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: So exactly. I am old and wise. And the truth is SEO has not changed that much, as crazy as it sounds, since basically Google came around and kind of changed everything. And since Google came around, it’s been pretty much the Google show. And we follow what Google says. That is generally my life advice. Why you should trust me, besides the fact I’m old and wise, is because it works.
So Steve, who is the co-founder, and Matt and I started this site called The Hollywood Gossip in 2006. We decided to take our SEO skills, rather than using them for other people, but use them for ourselves. That site at its peak was getting somewhere around 60 million page views a month. And that is primarily off of SEO. So our stuff works in practice. You can see me still doing it today on the Mediavine blog. And all the same techniques I like to teach people, we use in our own posts. And they rank really well. So I would say our own dog food works. I’m not supposed to use that expression anymore. Why did I do that? Sorry. Sorry, Jenny.
JENNY GUY: You did it intentionally. I saw you think about it, and you decided to do it. I was going to say in a less disgusting way that the proof is in the pudding. And it is visible on everything from The Hollywood Gossip, which is the number one Hollywood gossip site of its kind on the internet, and then on the Mediavine blog, which grows traffic year over year, doubles. So what is the name of the series, Eric, if people are interested in following along with your SEO teachings from Splinter?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: It is SEO Like A CEO on our blog. And one day it’ll turn into YouTube. We shall see.
JENNY GUY: It’ll be so exciting. So both of these, they’re authorities. We trust them. We had a lot of fives out there in terms of expertise. So that would might like maybe going with our ninja, I would say that was the lamest Ninja Turtle, which maybe was Donatello. I like Donatello because he drove the van, and he had the bo staff, but some people did not. Anyway.
SEO is one of those terms in digital content creation that is thrown around so much that it kind of loses meaning, like I said. I would like to hear each of your explanations on what is SEO in 2 to 3 minutes. And actually, I’m going to start with Nora for that one, please.
NORA SCHLESINGER: I would say, really simply, SEO is the process of organizing your site and creating your content so that it is the most useful to Google users. And a lot of things go into that, so that is a very high-level explanation, but ultimately that’s why you should care about it. And that’s why you should learn about it.
JENNY GUY: That was like 15 seconds, and you nailed it. So Eric, top that.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Good luck. Wow. That was perfect. Yeah, no, I mean, SEO is obviously Google. It’s remembering that Google has one job, and that’s returning the best result it can for the reader. And what that necessarily means isn’t always what I think we think it means. So it’s a combination of is this the right content based on what the user is searching for. Is it a good experience? There’s a lot of factors that go into that. So SEO is trying to make sure that you are delivering the best result to Google based on what that person is searching.
And a lot of people think it’s really technical. It’s not all technical. So much of it goes into making sure you are writing that content that people are searching for. So I think SEO is a content strategy more so than even a technical skill.
JENNY GUY: That is helpful in that the point of it all is to write good content. I’m going to say this– and this is off of the– I’m going off script. Shocker. I do it every time.
Based on your definitions, it sounds to me like there might be a mind shift– a shift in mindsets, which is that instead of writing whatever content that you will feel that you want to write or that you’re passionate about writing, you’re instead incorporating what people are searching for on Google. Is there a way to do those two things simultaneously? Does being great at SEO mean sucking the joy out of writing the posts and doing the thing that you love? An I ask Nora, will you tell me that from a blogger perspective? Does making yourself good at SEO mean that you’re unhappy as a blogger?
NORA SCHLESINGER: No, it shouldn’t. Absolutely not. I mean, what you’re doing is coming up with ideas, and then iterating until you hit the sweet spot between what Google users want and what you want, like basically what you want to provide and what Google users want to consume. And so for me, for example, that looks like– I’ll be like– OK, I run a food blog, so all my posts are recipes. So I’ll be like, I have a recipe for a grain-free apple tart, or something like that. And I’ll do some keyword research, and I’ll start with like paleo, which is like another word for– well, there’s some overlap. Whatever.
I’m trying to put it into terms that I think people are searching for. So I’ll look for like paleo apple tart, grain-free apple desserts, like all these different sort of like high-level topics. And then I’ll start drilling down to see which of those presents a good opportunity. And if none of those present a good opportunity, I will look at related keywords in any way, keep going until I find the best way to describe or kind of like query that thing that I want to write about. And I might have to adapt it a little bit.
So it’s possible that people aren’t looking for apple tart. They’re looking for apple crumble or something. And at that point, I have to be– I have to kind of make the judgment call, like if grain-free apple tart is not the right opportunity, I will either pivot to like a different keyword, and that’ll change the recipe slightly. Or I’ll just– sometimes I make the executive decision to say, I just really love this recipe. I want to share it. I’m just going to put it out there with the understanding that this is not going to really help me, at least in the short-term, with SEO.
In the long-term, it might be great for like a round-up of Thanksgiving desserts or something. So there’s always a way, I think, to incorporate what you want to be doing into an SEO strategy. You just have to be flexible so that you can, like I said, find that middle ground between– sort of the Venn diagram between your–
JENNY GUY: What Google wants.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Yeah. Like what you want to do and what Google wants you to do. I mean, that’s the cynical way of putting it.
JENNY GUY: I am cynical when it comes to SEO. Maybe I am. Maybe I’m super cynical.
NORA SCHLESINGER: I think the most optimistic way would be like what people need you to provide, and what you want to provide.
JENNY GUY: How to serve my people.
NORA SCHLESINGER: How to serve your audience. Right. I mean, really, like that’s really what it is.
JENNY GUY: Yep! And that’s a really helpful way to look at it as opposed to looking at Google as like the monster from like Skynet and Terminator. I don’t know why I’m on this kick today from like the ’80s and ’90s.
NORA SCHLESINGER: I don’t know any of these references, I just want you to know
JENNY GUY: I’m just going with it. I’m going with it.
NORA SCHLESINGER: I never watched Ninja Turtles. I totally like I’m with you, except like don’t ask any follow-up questions.
JENNY GUY: I will not ask which Ninja Turtle is your favorite. But instead of thinking of it as like Google is this faceless, and we have to please Google, thinking of it as what are people– how can I serve the needs of the people who are looking for content? Super helpful.
Eric, for you, same question. Is there a way to balance these two things out?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Man, following up Nora is incredibly challenging. She so concisely answered.
JENNY GUY: I’ll let you go first next time. I’ll let you go first next time.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: No, it’s fine. I’d rather have her answer these things. That’s great. That is, honestly, the best way to look at it. It is a balance. You’re either following a trend, or creating a trend a lot of times also with content. And that’s an important way to look at it.
If there is nobody else who has ever done what you’re writing about. And sometimes that happens a lot in like news or things in like The Hollywood Gossip. So we won’t even always be able to look through keyword research, for example, on that kind of site. And we just have to know from instinct, which I think applies actually to a lot of other types of blogging as well, not just news, like learning the types of things that your users are searching for, and then applying it to what you’re writing about, even if it doesn’t exist yet.
So that was a great example, knowing what the trendy diets are. That’s obvious. And you might be creating something new that doesn’t have any search results around. But if it applies to that diet, you might be the first person to have come up with a way to make a paleo-friendly– whatever your example was– apple tart. And now it becomes a search.
So sometimes it does work, and it’s really just about knowing your audience. And I think– I don’t know. At this point, when we do SEO articles, I don’t even have to research SEO articles, and they all do very well and get traffic. I knew web story SEO was going to be a search term before there was a term web story SEO. And what do you know? It’s one of our top blog posts. And that just comes from knowing your readers.
JENNY GUY: And also being Eric Hochberger. But you guys can all do it, too, is what we’re saying here. You don’t have to be him.
So specifically talking about– because the title of this episode is “Make Your Own Luck With Google.” And the reason why we did that was because I see comments all the time. We all do. Why does Google hate me? And it’s all over the place. It’s in Facebook groups. It’s frustration. I’ve been doing– I’ve been working. I’ve been working. I’ve been working for months, and my traffic won’t go anywhere, or my traffic tanked, or the last update screwed me, or over and over. It’s over. So EAT, BERT, Core, one algorithm shift can have a massive impact on traffic. We know that.
So much so that as publishers, we live in fear of these changes under– all the time. So let’s be basic for a second. And I want to talk about what the heck a Google algorithm shift is, and why we should or shouldn’t live in fear of them. And I would love to hear why they’re actually a good thing for readers when it’s all said and done. And Eric, we will start with you on that one.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: So I want to go back to Nora so I can just follow-up and say exactly. It’s so much easier. No, I think most of these algorithm changes, at the end of the day, are Google trying to combat, for the most part, people trying to over-SEO, or optimize to the search engine. And they’re trying to deliver the best result. And I think every SEO out there is trying to figure out how we can game the system to become those top results.
So all they’re trying to do, again, at the end of the day, is surface the best result to the reader. And a lot of times we are at odds with them, I feel, not necessarily the SEOs that are going to be listening to this. But SEOs that are for hire for other people.
So as a content creator, chances are you’re not necessarily at odds with Google. And so a lot of these algorithms aren’t going to directly impact you. They always say the impact less than 1% of search results, whatever the official Google stance is. That’s because they’re trying to combat, again, people that are gaming linking algorithms, trying to game them, basically saying, I have authority on this topic when they really don’t. So if you’re writing good content and you are properly doing things, chances are the algorithm hits that you’ll even get are going to be temporary. Just keep doing the right thing.
JENNY GUY: What is a Google algorithm?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: That was a good question. So the Google algorithm, I guess, would be the overall way of saying all the different ranking factors that go into Google. And there are hundreds of them, thousands of them, whatever the number is at this point. Back in the day, it used to just be page rank was one algorithm, or it was the algorithm.
Now there are so many different factors that go into whether your page ranks or not. And so we call them an algorithm change. So like BERT was– I don’t know– switched to natural language processing a little bit more, and trying to figure out more of the intent. Every one of them, if you like geek out about it, there’s a ton of new information every time they do an algorithm change.
But again, they’re all have the same goal in mind– delivering the best result, getting rid of web spam. So I think so much of it is everyone overanalyzes how do I optimize for EAT or BERT. You just optimize for the best user experience and writing the right content.
JENNY GUY: And we’re going to talk about this more in a second, but there’s a big one coming up in May. And I’ve noticed in the time that I’ve been learning SEO from sensei Eric that there are– if Google is going to do a big thing, for the most time, they’re going to tell you about it. They’re going to warn you, and they’re going to tell you exactly what they’re going to do to give you time to figure out what you need to do to put yourself within it.
I won’t say too much about Core Web Vitals, because we are going to go back to that. But Nora, I’d love to hear your perspective on how do you recommend bloggers change their mindset when things at Google change. Do you recommend we all go crazy for BERT and change everything we’re doing?
NORA SCHLESINGER: No. So I’m a big believer– and I’m sort of echoing some of what Eric said here. I’m a big believer in writing good content, and focusing on quality over quantity, user experience over Google experience, because, ultimately, if Google is programmed or the algorithm is done correctly, which they’re getting very good at, those two things should be almost the same thing.
I also want to really encourage people to move away from beliefs like, “Google hates me,” or “When am I going to get lucky with Google?” or any of these sort of like “It’s written in the stars” type of mindsets. I mean, if I can offer like a little tough love, I really don’t mean to criticize anyone here, but I think that if your site is being hit and devastated repeatedly and not recovering from major algorithm shifts, that tells me something about the sort of quality of your site.
And I’m really– please take this as the tough love that it’s intended to be. But that tells me that it’s time to really dig deep into your site and make some big changes. So that means looking for things like thin content, slow site speed, sort of sloppy, or difficult to maneuver site structure, sort of menus, and things like that. There also might be some authority issues. So you really kind of have to take a step back and know what you’re doing, and why you’re doing it, and kind of what you want to be seen as the authority in.
And if you are doing that, I don’t really– I mean, I, of course, pay attention to the algorithm updates, particularly when it’s something big, like the May update we’re going to talk about. I certainly want to be aware of what’s coming. I certainly want to stress test my site in advance if I have that information to make sure that I’m not going to be just like devastated by it.
JENNY GUY: Yeah.
NORA SCHLESINGER: But most of the time I don’t worry about algorithm updates because I know that there’s this one thing that Google wants website owners to do. And I’m doing it to the best of my ability. That doesn’t mean that like my site speed is perfect, or like I don’t have a couple too many plugins, or maybe I could have optimized that one post a little bit better. There’s always ways to improve.
But at its core, I really focus on the quality of my site and its content. And so I don’t have to be afraid of Google algorithm updates and various changes that seem to come out of nowhere and for no reason whatsoever punish you.
JENNY GUY: All really, really helpful, Exploring The Local Life asks will we be talking about CLS. We will, actually, in just a little bit.
I have a question for you guys. So have you ever paid for an SEO audit or course, from our audience. How much? And which one? Was it helpful to you? Tell us what you have done to help yourself learn, or improve on your SEO, and did it help? Just give us a little rundown. If you don’t mind spilling the tea, we will definitely listen to it.
So we called this– like I said, we called this episode “Make Your Own Luck With Google” because that is essentially the goal of all SEO experts. And all SEO advice is while we can’t predict every change that will happen with the Google algorithm, there are things that we can control. And it’s about controlling the things that we can, and optimizing in the best way that we can. So what is the foundation of a good SEO strategy? And I’m going to start with Nora for that.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Sure. In my opinion, it is good keywords. And by that I mean not just high potential, so relatively low vol– or sorry– low difficulty, high volume. I almost misspoke in a really unfortunate way there.
But also making sure that the keywords that you’re choosing are the right fit for your site. And that means knowing what your site’s authority is, or should– like what you’re trying to make it, making sure that all your content kind of fits under that umbrella, and then making sure that the content that you are creating is very useful, educational, and in most cases– I’m not sure like The Hollywood Gossip, no offense, but that’s probably more an entertainment goal.
But I’m sort of speaking from my personal experience. It’s typically I want to educate people on what this recipe is, how to make it, why you might want to. I don’t know. Things like ingredient substitutions, storage tips, things like that that really make it a robust resource on this recipe, or this type of food.
So I mean, I think that as long as your content strategy is really focused and well thought out, to me, that is you’re the majority of the way there. Of course, there’s also technical considerations.
JENNY GUY: Sure.
NORA SCHLESINGER: But if you don’t know anything about technical SEO, if you can, take a course or hire someone. If you have the budget for that, definitely do it. But if you have to choose between devoting yourself to content versus technical, I strongly recommend– I think content will get you a lot farther in terms of being sort of the root of a strong SEO approach or strategy.
JENNY GUY: That is all very helpful. I’m going to ask Eric the same question. We have a lot of people giving all– we’ve got various things from $1,000 to $500. We’ve got audits. We’ve got some votes for Stupid Simple SEO. We had somebody said, no, Eric tells us all of it for free. We had somebody who said $1,200. We’ve got all sorts of great comments. And thank you guys for sharing all of that with us.
There’s a lot out there. There is a lot out there offered. SEO is a big business, for sure. And we are going to get to the question on low difficulty and high search volume in terms of numbers in a minute because we’re going to talk keywords next. But Eric, what is the foundation of a sound SEO strategy to you?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: I can’t just say ditto again with Nora? I mean, it’s the same concept. It’s like making sure that you’re writing the right content that readers are searching for. It’s always going to come down to I say like 90/10 versus content versus technical. The technical SEO is such a smaller aspect.
And who cares? If nobody is even searching for the term or you’re going after the wrong term, you can have the fastest site, the most perfect site structure. But if you don’t have the right keyword or you don’t have what someone is searching for, who cares if you rank number one for it? What matters most is that you’re ranking high, and you balance that kind of difficulty that I guess we’ll be talking about next. But making sure this is attainable within your sights level of expertise or authority.
And again, this is not a knock on you as a person, as Nora was saying before, like this is just you have to recognize what your quality level is to Google. And it’s not necessarily a quality you are as, obviously, a human being. But even as a– let’s say you’re a cook.
JENNY GUY: The algorithm is not that advanced yet.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Right. You might be making the best recipe in the world. Google doesn’t have taste buds. They’re not tasting your actual recipe. So I don’t care how good of a cook you are. Google doesn’t know. So you have to look at it from that lens.
What is your level of expertise within Google? And then what do they think you’re an expert at? Making sure you’re blogging about the right things is the most important part of your strategy.
JENNY GUY: Yeah. That was very helpful. And again, it’s not personal. It is an algorithm. It’s a machine. It’s not judging you as a person, or you as, like Eric said, your skills as a crafter, or cook, or parent, or any of whatever it is that you’re publishing about.
I want to talk about keywords. And we actually had a question about low difficulty and high search volume. But keywords are if you were to choose two or three large concepts in SEO that are the big foundational ones, keywords. And Nora started out with keywords, so I’m going to go with Eric to talk about keywords. Give us your high-level keyword strategy or advice. And if you can work in low difficulty and high search volume, that would be great, too. Just go ahead. Let’s watch him do it, everyone.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: All right. First, you’re going to need a good keyword planning tool. There’s the Google one. That’s free. Keyword Planning Tool, they’re very creative with their naming over there. And that is geared towards people that are buying Google AdWords or buying paid search results.
And honestly, that’s what powers most of these different tools you’re going to end up buying anyway. So if you use SEMrush, like we do, key search. I’m sure there’s a million other people can share in the chat. But the most important thing is having a good keyword research tool that you know how to use and you come back to, because you are going to have to go and search the terms you want to go after. Don’t necessarily always look at the competitive score that all these tools give you, because a lot of times that’s going to be based upon paid search.
So we’re saying what’s the difficulty level of you winning? A lot of times you just want to go and search incognito or private browsing. That should be your best friend whenever you’re doing SEO. Always browse private. So it’s not giving you search–
JENNY GUY: Incognito, right?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Incognito or private browsing for Safari people that are out there. Go into those kind of– go and make sure you search the search term you’re going after. And you should probably be able to actually figure out the difficulty yourself, rather than using a tool. Look at who’s ranking in the top 10, and if those are all names that scare the bejeebus out of you, move on to the next one.
That is how I do keyword difficulty, as funny as that is. I don’t trust in the tools, because so many of them are just really spitting out the paid keyword difficulty. And that’s not necessarily true for all of them, but I would use that as a gut check to figure out what that balance is. And again, it’s about figuring out your level of expertise. And you are the one that’s going to know over time where you’re most likely to rank on a term. And we have on the blog like, “How to Read Your Own Google Search Console.”
JENNY GUY: Yep, we’re sharing that one.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Go and find something you already know you’re an expert on. And those are things you’re going to be more likely to rank on. So it’s learning what you’re an expert on, and what you’re going to be likely to rank on. That’s what that difficulty balance is. But then making sure there’s search volume for it. You can be the best expert in the world, but going after a term that has 10 people searching for it, probably not worth your time.
JENNY GUY: We’re getting a lot of people that use SEMrush. We’re getting people that use various other things. And then we have Mediavine member Brandon Gaille just released RankIQ, which helps you target high volume, low competition keywords specifically. It’s a brand new tool, but it seems to have great promise. That’s Rachel. We actually had a question about RankIQ. Do either of you have experience with that one? No?
NORA SCHLESINGER: No, not really.
JENNY GUY: We’ll find out. Maybe we’ll ask questions. Nora, same question to you. Give us your high-level keyword strategy, please.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Yeah. I would definitely echo everything Eric was saying. I use Ahrefs for– I’m not really sure how to pronounce it. It’s A-H-R-E-F-S. It’s kind of the direct competitor to SEMrush. I’ve used both. My personal preference is for Ahrefs. I think it makes keyword research easier. It just, to me, kind of emphasizes keyword research and tracking more than SEMrush does. So that’s my preference.
I tend to start with the site’s authority, and try to characterize in roughly three to four kind of umbrella terms what are the themes that we are trying to establish the site’s authority for. Then for each of those terms, I start brainstorming fairly large concepts that are– I mean, this is like a little nebulous, but not quite as specific– or not quite as broad as the authority term, but not so specific that I’m going to get kind of backed into a corner if I start searching on that term.
So I start with those subterms. Gosh, I wish I had like a chart or something. But basically, I start with all these things I’ve been brainstorming. I start one by one putting them into my keyword research tool.
JENNY GUY: And you Ahrefs or Ahrefs?
NORA SCHLESINGER: And I use– yeah, the one that starts with an A.
JENNY GUY: Aha-refs.
NORA SCHLESINGER: And then– Aha-refs, I like that. That’s actually kind of what it should be called. And then I start to drill down on those concepts. So sometimes the first keyword idea that I came up with is actually a great fit. And I’ll talk in a minute about how I determine fit.
But then sometimes I start drilling down, looking for related keywords, iterating on that keyword, things like that. So I do– it’s as much an art as a science. And it does take some time to do good keyword research.
And in terms of the fit, I have difficulty in volume parameters. And one thing I really like about Ahrefs is that it separates out sort of the organic difficulty of the keyword versus the PPC– the paid search difficulty, or cost of the keyword. So you can kind of ignore the paid– so I mean, that’s just not what I do.
JENNY GUY: Right.
NORA SCHLESINGER: So for my purposes, I ignore the paid search metrics. And I can look at the organic difficulty. Then the last thing I do is I actually search the term for most of the terms that I– if I’ve settled on writing them or kind of going after them, I actually search the term, because sometimes what happens is because, as you said, Google is a machine. I mean, it’s only as smart as its inputs. And so sometimes I’ll see that the top, let’s say, 10 pages, there aren’t a lot of high competition, or high authority competitors competing for this term.
But what you actually see when you look at the SERP is the first 5 to 10 competitors are like massive sites that you will never compete with. And I’m not going to write something if I know that I have zero chance of getting to the first page. It’s just not really worth your time.
So my last step is always to Google the term to make sure, number one, it is actually what I think it is. Because with recipes this is less of a concern, but if you’re doing– I don’t know. We have clients in all different categories. So sometimes something sounds really great, and it turns out it’s a competitor’s brand name. And so you can’t write– you don’t want to write for that term. So it gives you just a final gut check on whether or not this is the right term for you.
As far as the actual numbers, I’m backing up a little bit here to the difficulty in volume parameters, I just want to echo what Eric said. You should know what is appropriate for your site, because it depends so much on where your site stacks up to competitors, meaning like, what’s your authority, your level of authority, your number. What’s everyone else’s? Sort of where do you stand relative to the pack?
So I can’t really give you a number to shoot for. I would say lower is better. Lower difficulty is always better. But it’s not always higher volume is better. So I would rather go after a lower volume, lower difficulty keyword that I know I can get on the first page for. And by that I mean like a couple hundred searches a month, not like four searches a month.
And it just really depends. If you’re building a brand new site, go after the ones that are like a difficulty level of one, but maybe only have 50 searches a month, because you’re just trying to establish yourself, versus I’ve been blogging for seven years. I can go after a higher difficulty level, higher volume keyword.
So it really varies by site. And I can’t really give specific parameters. But I think checking the SERPs, comparing yourself to whoever else is going after that keyword, that’s a really good metric for kind of getting a gut sense of where you stand.
JENNY GUY: Very– I love that your last step is to just Google it and see where– see if you’re actually getting the things, all of those fancy keywords, all the things you might be paying for or not paying for. But at the end of the day, use it the way a user would, and see if you’re actually going to get what you’re trying to do.
We got some feedback from Michelle Grubb-Blackwood but she said, I actually find that they are both, good but Key Search is user-friendly, but SEMrush gives more details. We’ve got more people loving Stupid Simple SEO courses. Eric actually has a segment on the Stupid Simple SEO. So we are also fans.
I don’t know if you guys can help with this one or not. We’ve advised them to email in to support. But we’ve got a comment here that says Google had an algorithm update somewhere in December or January. And I had a jump in traffic. My health check site is all teal. But I think there was an algorithm update in February. And I see my site traffic gradually decreasing. I’m not sure how to go forward from this to stop the decline since I’m not changing much on the site, and just carry on writing the way I did. Is there something they should be looking for, Eric?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: If their search volume is declining, is that what they’re saying?
JENNY GUY: So it sounds like they had– whatever algorithm update was in December or January gave them a jump in traffic. Their site health is all teal. But then something in February happened, and they started to see the traffic decreasing. They’re not sure how to stop the decline
ERIC HOCHBERBER: I mean, generally, if you’re ever losing traffic, the first thing I do is see which terms you’ve lost traffic on. Maybe your terms haven’t even dropped in traffic, and it’s just a change in seasonality, depending on what you blogged about. So it’s always important to compare the same time period. So are you down for this time of year in February? And maybe you had a 10% year over year growth last month. You have 10% year over year growth still this month. And maybe this is just your natural trend.
But really looking. Did you lose a keyword or did those keywords lose searches? I mean, that’s going to find your answer for you. It may not even be an algorithm change. And a lot of times you see it’s not.
It may just be something you wrote about has now dropped nowhere near a link from your home page anymore. Maybe it just dropped down in your feed. And you just need to bubble it back up, whether it’s republishing it, which I don’t particularly love, or writing new complementary posts about it, and linking over to it, reminding Google, hey, I still have this great content. There’s a lot of different strategies that you see on losing a ranking. But it’s tough to know what without knowing the exact cause of decline.
JENNY GUY: But it is helpful to tell people to zoom out a little bit. It very probably might have nothing to do with an algorithm update. It just could be your natural trend. So look at year over year traffic. Look as many years back as you can in Google Analytics and see, is this something that happens every year?
Yeah. Lizzie Maz just said, check Google Search Console, too. Go in there and look, and investigate before we immediately say, Google hates me. We’re moving away from that. We’re going to look at year over year traffic, and zoom out a little bit.
Another core concept of SEO is linking. I would love to bust some myths here. I would love to know, are external links more valuable than internal links? How many links is too many in a post? Is there a goal we should set when we’re writing a post? Nora, let’s start with you on that one, please.
NORA SCHLESINGER: I don’t think one type of link is more valuable than the other. I think they’re definitely valuable. So external links– and by that, are you are you talking about external links that point to your site or the–
JENNY GUY: I mean, yes. Yeah. Getting a backlink from somebody else.
NORA SCHLESINGER: OK. Right. That’s what I thought. So external links are extremely valuable for basically convincing Google that your site is as valuable and authoritative as you say it is. So the more– so this method was actually based on academic citations. So the practice of basically like if you write a paper about something really scientific and complicated, if other really smart scientists start referencing your paper in their future papers, or research, or whatever– I’m obviously not a scientist, nor am I an academic, but this is how I understand it goes– that confers a lot of authority onto your report, or your findings, or your paper, or whatever as like sort of the benchmark for this kind of information.
So Google, because it was founded by nerdy academics, and I say that with love, they borrowed this concept when they were programming Google to understand authority. So if, let’s say, I write– well, actually, I have a great example. I have a post about ratatouille. It’s actually not even ratatouille. It’s like pretty ratatouille, which is called something different in French. It doesn’t matter.
But the point is it was just this sort of like one-off post. I didn’t really– I had fun making it. I posted it. This was before I was really serious about SEO. And it just went like bananas. And the reason why is because quite a few– I think it started with one very, very high authority vegan site found it and linked to it. And from there, lots of other food sites linked to it. And eventually, I think it was on BuzzFeed at one point. And I can’t remember where else it’s been. But it’s like made the rounds.
So all of these extremely high authority sites in the food space pointed back to my site via this Ratatouille page. And they said like, hey, we think this is a great recipe. And so Google said, like, oh, well, I think your site knows a lot about food. And you think this other site, Nora’s site knows a lot about food. So I’m going to infer that Nora’s site must know something about food, because you’re a credible source. So that boosts my authority level, so to speak, with Google.
So backlinks are something that I really highly recommend going for organically, which means write great content, get it out there, and if you’ve done that, people will find it, and link back to you. Submit it to things like foodgawker. Although, that’s not as helpful as it used to be. But submit it to sites like that if you’re kind of new and you’re trying to get yourself out there.
I don’t typically recommend that individual bloggers reach out for backlinks, like do cold backlink outreach. What you can do is reach out to people who have referenced your work, or maybe link to your homepage. And you want them to link to a specific page or vice versa. There are appropriate ways and I think productive ways to reach out for backlinks.
I’ve never done that. And I just keep writing content and have a decent backlink profile. So again, like almost everything I’m going to say kind of boils down to write really great content and get it out in the world. And the right things will happen.
So that was a very long-winded explanation of external links and their value. Very quickly, internal links are extremely valuable for both getting your content found, because Google follows links throughout your site, like as though they’re kind of hallways, and also just sort of establishing the structure of your site, establishing similar posts, conferring authority internally, setting up priorities. So internally, if a bunch of posts link to this one post, Google will say like, oh, this post is really valuable, or useful, or whatever, and will kind of take a closer look at that.
As far as kind of minimums, I do– I recommend at least one internal and one external. And now I’m talking about outbound links, not backlinks.
JENNY GUY: Right.
NORA SCHLESINGER: But that you want to sort of share the love. Google likes to see you pointing to other sources, because it assumes you can’t possibly be the authority on every single word you talk about . So pointing to other resources.
I like to do about one link per like 500-ish words, one internal, one external. So typically in my posts, I do about two to three of each roughly. But whatever makes sense kind of organically throughout the post. I don’t try to force it.
JENNY GUY: All amazing advice. And I just wanted to clarify one quick point. There were many things I wanted to jump in on, but that was all good. And I wanted to get through it. That was great.
When you’re linking out to someone, you want to show love. You want to be a good web citizen. You don’t want to link out to someone who is writing a post that is the exact same– trying to target the same keyword that you’re writing about, right?
NORA SCHLESINGER: Absolutely. Yes.
JENNY GUY: OK.
NORA SCHLESINGER: What you want to be doing is– I’m trying to think of a great example. But so in the ratatouille post, my recipe calls for a spice mix called herbes de Provence, which is like a very specific regional– well, it’s not really regional, but it’s a spice mix that is supposed to evoke sort of a region of cooking. I think I pointed to– I want to say Wikipedia maybe, or some site that kind of defined and elaborated on the spice mix, and what’s included, and kind of where it comes from, and what kinds of recipes it’s typically used in. So I wasn’t pointing to like another ratatouille recipe.
JENNY GUY: If you use this ratatouille, this ratatouille is better.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Right. Try this superior ratatouille.
JENNY GUY: This is so much better. Look, their pictures are better, too. There’s a video. Go look at this one instead.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Right. So the idea of wanting to write really thorough content that really kind of like answers people’s questions, and educates them, and makes them confident enough to make this, in my case, recipe. It’s always going to involve some sort of like, here’s some more information about this element, or learn more here, or watch this video for like how to shape– I don’t know– like bread dough, or something.
I’m trying to think of examples on the fly. There’s always going to be something that you should be teaching the audience, but don’t really have the resources for, like you don’t have a post on your site, or you don’t have a post yet maybe. And so there’s always going to be a reason to link outbound, and kind of share the love, so to speak. But also kind of reinforce this purpose of like educating the reader in the best way possible.
JENNY GUY: Yeah. Providing the best user experience. It all keeps rolling back down to that. Eric, I’m going to let you talk a little bit about links. And then I’m going to– we have about four really good questions come from the audience. So you talk about links, and then I’m going to fire these at you. Please.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: OK. I echo everything Nora said. Real quickly, I mean, honestly, like internal, external, and backlink. I like to separate external and backlink. They’re all equally important, but for different ways. So as Nora said, you’re giving a citation.
So doing that with an external link is good. It’s actually good. It is good to be seen as you can trust me because I have a citation. Imagine writing a book report back in school and not quoting anyone. You would be failed.
So look at it the same way with Google. Don’t get an F. Get an A. Cite your sources, not necessarily your competitors, at least.
JENNY GUY: Good sources, though. You know who else thinks this? Steinbeck, and here’s why. Don’t be like my Aunt Doris.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Right. Exactly. Or your fake news, I don’t know if– don’t do that. Quote someone that has authority on it, and you trust, and you would say, I am willing to bet my entire authority on this one person, because if they go bad, you can get penalized as well.
But external links are good to link to people. And internal links are still super valuable, because, again, it’s something you control. You don’t always control backlinks. But now that you’re an expert on ratatouille, in that ratatouille post, you can link to similar recipes, and you can now spread some of that authority that you got from those other sites. And that is your power, because that’s internal links.
Number-wise, I’m a little more aggressive it sounds like than Nora. I like to do– I don’t know– a link every couple– every paragraph or two, honestly, if you can, internal links.
JENNY GUY: Internal.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Yeah. External, I like a minimum of one on a post. If you can have more than one, that’s OK, too. It’s often good.
I’ll give a quick example because I think the audience might want one. With a lot of the SEO stuff, I will obviously link to Google if there’s a respected article. So here I’m talking about this. Here’s a link to the SEO Starter Guide, not necessarily a direct competitor to what I’m writing about. If I’m talking about a Core Web Vital, maybe I will link to web.dev, which is Google’s resource on how to improve your Core Web Vitals. There are a lot of things you can link to that will help your readers that aren’t direct competition to your search terms.
JENNY GUY: I knew that we would run a long time. We might go a little bit over. Will that kill anyone if we go a little bit over? We’re not going to get to all the comments, and there’s just too much. So I’m going to fire a whole bunch of questions. Astra said, “Which Is better when updating content, just updating a post or updating and republishing it?” Nora, I’m going to start with you on that one, because the next one is Search Console, and I want Eric to do that one.
NORA SCHLESINGER: 90% of the time I would say just update it. I’m not a fan of republishing. The only time I would recommend republishing if you have like totally overhauled this post, and it’s more new than not.
So if you’re optimizing– if you find that something’s ranking for a keyword on page three and you just want it on page one, and you kind of like tweak this, add that, move this paragraph, whatever, definitely don’t republish. If you’re like basically replacing all of the text, updating the recipe to be a new recipe, and replacing basically everything but the URL, then I might recommend republishing. But I would say 9 times out of 10 I do not republish. I just update.
JENNY GUY: Also, I know I’m meant to go quickly and not do this, but I’m going to do it anyway. You said something kind of key there, which was you’re updating everything but the URL.
NORA SCHLESINGER: URL, yeah.
JENNY GUY: Why would you not change the URL on your post?
NORA SCHLESINGER: Oh.
JENNY GUY: I know. I just went can of worms, and here they go.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Yeah. I think the simplest way to put it is I think a lot of people are tempted to update the URL because they think that communicates to Google what the post is about. Google has a million other ways to figure out what the post is about, and can totally deal with the cognitive dissonance of your URL not matching the title and recipe and whatever. And again, I’m talking about food blogs, but this applies regardless of what your topic is.
The reason I don’t update the URL is because you can do way more damage with either like a duplicate URL, or a duplicate post, or an improperly setup redirect, than you can– and it’s very easy to kind of screw up a redirect, or just like screw up the process. So there’s a lot more potential downside to updating the URL than there is to leaving it as is, even if it doesn’t match the post.
And no one’s ever going to call you out on that. No one is going to be like, this was supposed to be a post about cinnamon rolls, and it says cinnamon buns in the URL. No one cares.
JENNY GUY: OK. Eric, anything to add to that before we go into Google Search Console?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: Look at YouTube’s URLs. That’s all I’m going to say. But that was perfect, everything Nora said.
JENNY GUY: Nicole Burkholder said, “I’m a bit confused by Google Search Console. It will tell me that I’m on page two for a post query, but when I search incognito, I’m not seeing the post on the SERPs. I never know if it’s truly accurate and trustworthy for making plans on what to work on for SEO.”
ERIC HOCHBERBER: If we can’t trust Google, who can we trust with the tool? So a lot of times, yes, first, go incognito. It’s important to know that Google has different servers throughout the entire world, many, many servers, more than we could ever comprehend or count. And so chances are if you’re hitting a different data center, you might get different results. And that’s just an average across all of their different data centers.
And there’s also different sections of the search engine results. So you have carousels. So if you’re a food blogger, you probably are very familiar with carousels. If you do videos, if you do how-to posts, there’s all sorts of different sections you can get within search results. You can get position 0, which is a term that like if you just directly answer the question, they might extract part of your page and stick it at the top.
And any of those are going to count towards your ranking in that post, and so you might be looking for counting 1, 2, 3. I’m not in position three. I’m not even on page one. But you might have appeared in a carousel that’s only eligible on mobile, and you were searching on desktop. Or you might have been in a different country. There’s so many different factors, at the end of the day, you can probably trust Google there. It’s coming from their index, and that’s where they’re returning things from. You’re probably not able to verify and see it.
JENNY GUY: OK. I’ve already determined that we’re probably going to have to do this again, because this is an awesome episode. Olya says, “Is it better to use links in your text for related posts on your website or is it better to use a block with pictures?” Who wants to do it? Nora is making faces. It looks like she’s got that. Yeah, great.
NORA SCHLESINGER: No, I think that’s a fantastic question, and one that I wrestle with myself, because there’s a trade-off. I mean, I tend not to use pictures, because it can significantly increase the load time of the page. Let’s say you have– and this is like– I actually use the Create Card List now.
But if I’m sticking straight to the question, I would recommend using a link, because I’m assuming that you’re probably recommending like several other posts. In other words, if it’s a post about pancakes, maybe you’re linking to like every other pancake and waffle recipe on your site, like if you like this, try these. If you’re talking about adding 4, or 5, 6, 10 more large, high res pictures to this page, you’re going to drastically affect the load time, which is a huge ranking factor.
I think that people may be more inclined– I’d almost recommend A/B testing this. You can restrict it to like one or two recommendations. It kind of depends on what you’re trying to do. But broadly speaking, I would recommend skipping the images, or at least the full-size images, and just sticking to linking text for page speed load time reasons.
JENNY GUY: Eric, anything to add on that one?
* Editorial note: Since the airing of this episode, “Grow.me” has been rebranded to “Grow.” *
ERIC HOCHBERBER: 100% agree. Link on text when you can over images. It’ll be better for you, and trust me. How many times have you as a reader, when you’re reading a block of text, you see a link, and it’s what you want to read about, you are going to click on it. So it’s good for users, too. Don’t worry. And if you want pretty pictures and good recommended content for your readers, I have a great product for you. It’s called Grow.me. Check it out. A quick little plug.
But yeah, I mean I would not necessarily go with the images. And this is as one of the people who developed Create. So I’m still going to say plain text whenever you can.
JENNY GUY: Nicole says–
NORA SCHLESINGER: One thing, can I jump in with one more thing about linking?
JENNY GUY: Of course, yeah.
NORA SCHLESINGER: This is a little off-topic, but I just want to note that you should make sure that your theme really highlights links. So I’ve seen more sites than I would have expected that have a very, very minimal, or almost no difference between static text and hyperlinked text.
And so like Eric was saying, if you’re skimming and you see something that you like, you’re going to click on it. Not if you don’t know it’s a link. So this only really– effectively linking text only works if you have a way to highlight your links, which should be built into your theme. But I just want to call that out.
JENNY GUY: It’s got to be a big accessibility thing, right? If people can’t– you want to make this as obvious and as transparent for your readers as possible. We’re almost out of time, which is very hard to believe. I’m going to go as quickly as I can. We’re not going to get to all of them. But Nicole Hun says, “I struggle with where to place the links, either outbound or internal, in my posts. Since when I’ve had them too high up in the post, the post earns much less since readers click the link before spending much time on the posts that they’re reading.” Eric, will you take that one, please?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: See, perfect example. In-text links work. You don’t need images. Those people navigating away. I like to start with plain text at the top of my article as much as possible. I think it’s better for SEO as well just to have just plain text unlinked for the first few paragraphs of your post.
But yeah, I mean you’ve got to go wherever it’s organic. If that’s where it fits in at the beginning, do it. It’s OK if they leave. I would rather have organic, well-placed links than necessarily worrying about sending users away, especially if it’s internal, if they’re just going to another page. So that’s not so bad.
JENNY GUY: Great. This is one that I wanted to do. It’s another can of worms. Here we go. “What is your view on old thin content posts? I have quite a few old before Google Panda”– what is Google Panda? It sounds adorable– “not so good posts that don’t really get any traffic. They just sit there. But should I delete them to prevent them from harming Google’s view of the site as a whole?” Deleting old content, Nora, what are your views on that?
NORA SCHLESINGER: I think every single person that you ask who works in SEO will tell you something different. At least that’s been my experience. I waver a little bit. My personal– like the way I do it on my site– I’m not saying this is the right way– I tend to no follow them, no index, no follow them, so that Google just doesn’t crawl them. They’re not in the sitemap, things like that.
But I will say I don’t have a lot of those. I don’t have any of those like linky party type pages, or anything like that, which is, I think, a different story, because they literally offer, in my opinion, zero value to the reader whatsoever. I can’t see a situation where you would like organically link to one in a more substantive post. I mean, I’m totally willing to be wrong if someone wants to challenge this, but in my opinion, I don’t think they’re worth keeping. So something that’s like really, really thin, I would delete.
In a case where you have an old recipe from like five years ago when things were just really different, when people were writing like either a personal story, like the terrible stereotype of food bloggers, like a personal story, and then like, and here’s a scalloped potatoes recipe, or it’s just like one paragraph of text and then followed by the recipe, I would keep that, and optimize it. I would add more educational, useful text, and just in this case, maybe republish. I still probably wouldn’t republish as long as it’s still a scalloped potato recipe. But add substantive content, and it’s no longer a post that you need to consider deleting.
JENNY GUY: Fatten it up, in other words, if it’s thin.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Exactly.
JENNY GUY: Eric, same question to you. What are your thoughts on deleting content?
ERIC HOCHBERBER: I’ve had a blog post in draft form for so long on this, because I do have strong opinions. I think, as Nora alluded to before with a different topic, you can do sometimes more damage than good if you just start deleting content and you don’t properly set up a redirect, or properly do something with your site structure.
You might have something you consider thin content and had links coming in. You don’t want to lose those links. You might do more damage if you end up just blanket deleting everything from 2015 because you didn’t like your writing style back then. If you’re using a tool that will help you find things that have zero links to it, delete the crap out of it. It doesn’t matter. It has no links. I don’t know. If a tree falls in a forest, does it make a sound? No one knows. Just delete the content. That’s fine.
But then why are you even deleting it? If there’s no links to it, Google’s not finding it. Sorry, if there’s no internal links to it, then Google won’t find it. So if there’s no external links, I think it’s safe to delete as long as you clean up all the internal links to it as well. And again, you just have to do it right. And that’s my problem with the deleting thin content is I don’t think most people do it right.
JENNY GUY: The other thing that I think that we always talk about in these circumstances is it can take a lot of time to go through to be cleaning all this stuff up. Time that– we all have limited time, and time that you could be creating new content, or updating that content as opposed to spending a lot of time going back and deleting and doing redirects, and all that stuff. I think that make more content as opposed to be worrying about cleaning it up.
And I think that I totally get it as myself as a person who likes things to be neat. And if I have pivoted in my theme, or whatever, and there are all these posts that no longer fit the theme. And they don’t get a ton of traffic, but they get some. The users aren’t using my site the way that I am looking at it. They’re not looking at my old posts from five years ago. Nobody is doing that. So it’s not impacting other people. Is that fairly accurate? That it’s not– people aren’t viewing my site the way I view it.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: There’s not some thin penalty from Panda that goes to your whole site. It’s just that post won’t rank. Google looks at individual pages. So if you have some thin content and nothing links to it, that’s fine. Just make sure you don’t have links on your home page, on your major cornerstone content, on any– if that is like four or five hops from the home page, it doesn’t matter if it’s thin content.
JENNY GUY: Speaking of–
NORA SCHLESINGER: I also remove tags.
JENNY GUY: Oh, please.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Sorry, I was just going to say real quick.
JENNY GUY: No, yeah.
NORA SCHLESINGER: I will move categories and tags from it so that it’s not showing up in any indexes, like any menus on the site. I just try to make it as hidden as possible.
JENNY GUY: Put a rug on it, you know? It’s like the stain on your floor.
OK, guys, unfortunately, we are out of time. I have a final question for Eric and Nora. This is– we’re going to have to have it back. There are more questions in the comments. We had a question about Grow.me that we’re having emailed in.
While we know that SEO is a long and never-ending game, as is proven by this live with all the questions, we can’t help loving quick wins and action items here on the show. So to close out their episode, I would love for each of you guys to give your top tip that people can go and do right now without paying a ton of money, without emailing an expert, or getting an audit. What can they do today to help their SEO?
And I’m going to quickly make an announcement, and then we will start that with Nora. Our next Teal Talk– you guys, this has been an amazing hour. Thank you for being here. We will be back in two weeks, which is Thursday March 25, at 3:00 PM Eastern time. We are going to have– Eric is going to come back again, and then we are going to have our Grow.me product manager Sam Seeley. We’re going to be talking about– dun dun dun– first-party data, and Grow.me, and cookies, and all of the things that are coming our way, and some exciting new developments in the Grow.me product. So we hope you will join us there.
But guys, this has been an amazing hour, so much information packed in. I want to do it again. Nora, thank you for taking time out of your schedule to come and give us so much expertise.
NORA SCHLESINGER: My pleasure. It was great.
JENNY GUY: Will you lay us our tip, that tip on us about your top tip.
NORA SCHLESINGER: Yeah. I would say decide what your site’s authority is, what you want it to be, then put blinders on, and ignore all other themes, contents, keywords, trends, you name it, that doesn’t fit in that nice little package that you define for yourself.
JENNY GUY: Super helpful. And we are going to share in your links where we can find Nora. If you want to find her on her blog, at her day job, where she’s the casual, amazing CEO, that will all be linked up, as well as a Theory of Content episode that Nora did. So all of that is available there. Eric, same question to you.
ERIC HOCHBERBER: I’m just going to steal Nora’s answer so I can quickly do something else. Yeah, learn when you’re an expert on. Search through you Search Console. Find what you’re an expert on. Write about that stuff, related content. We have awesome blog posts on it we can link to.
I’m going to take it just to quickly say the May update, because I know a lot of people had questions about that, and we ran out of time. I promise you Mediavine is not ignoring CLS, or LCP, or FID, the three Core Web Vitals. Every tool that we have we are making sure are optimized for all three. And yes, we have a fix coming for ads for CLS. So May doesn’t have to be as scary as it seems.
And again, remember, just one ranking factor. You can still be failing all three of those and still rank. It’s going to be crazy. It’ll be fine, I guess what I’m trying to say. Relax. We will try to help you as much as we can.
JENNY GUY: I also promise you that we will have a Teal Talk episode before that algorithm update comes. And we will talk about all of that in detail. We’re going to have to have Nora and Eric back because this was great. Thank you guys for being great as always. And we will see you in two weeks to talk about cookies, and data, and privacy. Thank you guys again.
Stay up to date with the latest from Mediavine
Over 20 years in business, Mediavine has been an independent publisher and the voice of thousands of independent publishers. Forging a path of innovation within digital publishing and advertising, Mediavine …
Recent coverage on the topic of generative AI has proven that human readers want content written by human creators. Machines can’t replicate the emotion, much less the level of detail, …
Starting with a single site in 2003, Nathan Best, founder of the Best Little Sites Network, launched ComicBookMovie.com, the first of his network of sites. Created at the height of …
159 W 25th St., Suite #427
NY, NY 10001
888-705-1246
159 W 25th St., Suite #427
NY, NY 10001
888-705-1246

source

Gary Illyes from Google reiterated that it is still best for SEO purposes to use hyphens as separators in your URLs over using underscores are separators in your URLs. Why? Gary explained “we can’t easily segment at underscore and that’s why we are recommending dashes.”
This came up in the latest Search Off The Record podcast at the 17 minute mark or so where Martin Splitt mentioned “That’s why brevity for me is important as well. Yes, sure, you can use a URL shortener, but then you get links, like, I don’t know, something.something/8907d12. And I’m like, yeah, that’s not easy to remember at all. But if it’s like “mobile-friendly-test” and I can remember that. But if it’s “mobile_friendly-test” or something like that. And it’s like “ugh!” But Gary, you said there’s a difference.”
Gary responded saying “There’s a difference and that’s in our segmenter. Basically we use some parts of the URL for understanding what the page is about. And the way it works is that we need to be careful about where we are segmenting because many things on the internet, things that people write about have an underscore in them, so we can’t easily segment at underscore and that’s why we are recommending dashes.”
Here is the embed:

Now, there is a ton of history here on underscores versus hyphens in URLs and what Google has said about them before. In 2007, Matt Cutts of Google told us to use hyphens / dashes over underscores and clarified that he did not say that Google treated them equally. He did in 2017 say he want Google to treat underscores as separators but didn’t seem successful back then. In 2016, John Mueller said underscores vs. dashes doesn’t matter.
So I guess it still does matter, as this is the latest information from Google – that hyphens/dashes are still recommended over underscores for word separators in URLs.
One big caveat – I would not change established URLs just to add hyphens – that would be a horrible idea.
Forum discussion at Twitter.
The content at the Search Engine Roundtable are the sole opinion of the authors and in no way reflect views of RustyBrick ®, Inc
Copyright © 1994-2024 RustyBrick ®, Inc. Web Development All Rights Reserved.
This work by Search Engine Roundtable is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. Creative Commons License and YouTube videos under YouTube’s ToS.

source

Google’s “Search Off the Record” is a monthly podcast for behind-the-scenes looks at the company and its inner search workings. In last month’s episode, Google veterans John Mueller, Gary Illyes, and Martin Splitt addressed domain names and their impact on organic search rankings.
Here are a few takeaways.
Google’s “Search Off the Record” is a monthly podcast.
The Google team emphasized domain names are a business decision with no direct impact on organic search rankings. Choosing a domain name is the first and most important step in starting a site because it reflects a brand’s identity.
Moreover, Google says it ignores keywords in a domain. But I’ve seen many weak websites that rank well seemingly because they have keywords in the domain. I suspect this is because people often link to websites using the domain name as an anchor text. The keywords appear in the link text of external backlinks, and Google still seems to use keywords in anchor texts as a strong ranking signal.
Nonetheless, brand-focused domain names are best in my experience, for these reasons:
In short, brand-focused domain names are long-term investments. A keyword-rich domain means prioritizing organic search over other channels and, potentially, long-term growth.
Google’s John Mueller advises against letting Google access your “Coming soon” page because once Google crawls an empty page, it may not crawl it in the foreseeable future, if ever.
“Coming soon” pages are useful for marketing to generate buzz and raise interest among prospects. But block those pages from Google via a Robots.txt file.
Including the “World Wide Web” prefix in a domain in another longstanding SEO debate. Google doesn’t care if the prefix is there, provided the use is consistent. Pick a version and then redirect the other to it.
And be sure to claim both URLs in Search Console. Better yet, add a DNS record to that domain at your registrar for both versions (“www” and not) and both protocols (“https” and “http”).
This was not discussed in the episode, but it’s included in Google’s documentation and relevant to choosing domain names. Google shows site names in search results. When it doesn’t know the site’s name, Google will show the domain.
To help Google know your site name, use the “WebSite” schema structured data type that includes your site’s home page and name. Here’s example code from Google.
Google’s documentation lists other preferred tactics for brand names:
Share this article:
Copyright © 2005 – 2024. Practical Ecommerce® is a registered trademark of Confluence Distribution, Inc.

source